Model comparisons

QuantaLogic Model comparison

relevant information to pick the best model for you use case ( Chat / Prompt / Workflow )

QuantaLogic Model comparison

Training Data

Here's a table summarizing the training data for the specified models:

ModelTraining Data
GPT-4o-mini- Internet data up to October 2023 - Books, articles, scientific papers - Diverse multilingual content
Claude 3 Haiku (20241022)- Internet data up to July 2024 - Public labeling services data - Synthetic data generated internally
Claude 3.5 Sonnet- Similar to Claude 3 Haiku, but with more extensive datasets - Enhanced focus on complex reasoning tasks
Mistral Large 2 (24.11)- Extensive multilingual internet data - Scientific papers and technical documents - Code repositories
Mistral NeMo- Large-scale multilingual datasets - Specialized data for generalist tasks
Codestral 25.01- Extensive code repositories - Programming documentation - Technical papers and discussions

Strengths and Weaknesses

Here's a table outlining the strengths and weaknesses of each model:

ModelStrengthsWeaknesses
GPT-4o-mini- Excellent performance in benchmarks - Strong in math and coding - Cost-effective- Smaller context window compared to some competitors
Claude 3 Haiku (20241022)- Fast processing speed - Optimized for rapid interactions - Cost-effective for high-volume tasks- Less powerful than Sonnet for complex reasoning
Claude 3.5 Sonnet- Superior performance in complex reasoning - Advanced tool use capabilities - Excellent for multistep coding tasks- Higher cost compared to Haiku
Mistral Large 2 (24.11)- Top-tier performance across tasks - Excellent multilingual capabilities - Strong in math and coding- Higher cost compared to smaller models
Mistral NeMo- Large context window - Optimized for processing large volumes of data - Balanced performance across tasks- Less specialized than some task-specific models
Codestral 25.01- Specialized in code generation and completion - Supports over 80 programming languages - Large context window for analyzing extensive codebases- May be less versatile for non-coding tasks

Costs, Context Sizes, and Context Windows

Here's a table comparing the costs for 1 Million input and output tokens, along with context sizes and context windows:

ModelInput Cost (per 1M tokens)Output Cost (per 1M tokens)Context Size (tokens)Context Window (tokens)
GPT-4o-mini$0.15$0.60128K128K
Claude 3 Haiku (20241022)$0.25$1.25200K200K
Claude 3.5 Sonnet$3.00$15.00200K200K
Mistral Large 2 (24.11)$5.00$20.00128K128K
Mistral NeMo$2.00$2.00128K128K
Codestral 25.01$1.00$3.00256K256K

On this page